Beyond Small Groups: New Opportunities for Research in Computer-Supported Collective Learning

In this episode I unpack Kafai and Peppler’s (2011) article titled “Beyond small groups: New opportunities for research in computer-supported collective learning,” which is an analysis of participation within the Scratch community that compares and contrasts collaborative learning (i.e., learning within small groups) with collective learning (i.e., learning within massive groups).

  • Welcome back to another episode of the

    CSK8 podcast my name is Jared O'Leary

    in this week's episode I'm unpacking

    some scholarship in particular I'm

    unpacking a paper by Yasmin could phi

    and Kylie pep ler which is titled oat B

    on small groups : new opportunities for

    research and computer-supported

    collective learning in quote as always

    you can find links to the author's

    google scholar profiles in the show

    notes as well as a direct link to the

    paper itself and in this particular one

    I'm linking to research gate which

    allows you to access the paper for free

    so if we're actually interested in

    reading this particular article all you

    have to do is go to the show notes which

    is found in your description or by

    visiting Ghirardelli recom and simply

    click on this episode's title all right

    so here's the abstract for this paper

    but cscl research has focused on

    understanding and designing

    collaborative learning in diverse

    settings and configurations with support

    of computers within this research

    however most efforts have concentrated

    on studying small group configurations

    and thus examine what we would like to

    call collaborative learning ie the

    abilities needed to participate and

    support collaborations of typically two

    to five people much less emphasis has

    been placed on studying massive

    communities and participation in large

    groups comment in today's social

    networking sites and online gaming

    cultures that would shift the focus to

    collective learning ie the abilities

    needed to participate and support

    collaborations in massive groups in this

    paper we identify key dimensions of

    collective learning present observations

    of online and local participation in one

    open source web 2.0 community with over

    outline a research agenda for computer

    supported collective learning include

    all right so that abstract does a good

    job of kind of summarizing the overall

    paper itself if I were to give a

    one-sentence summary I'd say that this

    paper is an analysis of participation

    within the scratch community that

    compares and contrasts collaborative

    learning ie the learning within small

    groups with collective learning ie

    learning within massive groups okay so

    the authors begin this particular paper

    by discussing collaborative learning

    which is learning that quote in the

    sizes the abilities to participate in

    small groups whether online or offline

    or in combinations thereof in quote from

    page 17 so it's important to note that

    the authors suggest that collaborative

    learning can occur in both online and

    offline settings while many have found

    that collaborative learning is useful

    there are many kids who are learning in

    online communities that have thousands

    of members so not just like between one

    and five people to collaborate with but

    potentially hundreds or thousands of

    people to learn from so the authors are

    basically exploring what are the

    potential implications of learning

    within such spaces in particular on page

    does the size of the group matter

    unquote so this is a really good

    question that is important for all

    educators consider when engaging in any

    kind of collaborative or collective kind

    of learning process now a little bit

    further in the intro the authors refer

    to learning within such large

    communities as quote collective learning

    because it emphasizes the abilities to

    participate and perform in collectives

    and thus might be different from

    participation in small groups in quote

    from page 17 so as a quick summary of

    the intro the author suggests that

    although many people are already

    discussing learning within small groups

    Cuffy and pep ler in particular want to

    explore learning within massive groups

    now when this article is written it was

    in 2011 so the author's mentioned in the

    review of literature section that at the

    time of writing there's not a lot of

    research on this so some people for

    example we're studying designing wiki

    activities that were used in like

    university classes or maybe even

    after-school gaming clubs that had kids

    participating in video games that had

    potentially millions of players in it

    however there was not a lot of empirical

    research that kind of summarizes the

    different learnings going on across the

    spaces where that could be generalized

    outside of there in particular on page

    unclear what it means to participate

    effectively in large-scale groups to

    develop and foster a sense of community

    and belonging and to design for

    collective learning interactions in

    quote now later the authors describe the

    importance of collective learning and

    here's kind of a summary of some of the

    so this is from page 18 quote concepts

    such as collective cognitive

    responsibility indicate that

    interactions in these online communities

    could have different constraints and

    affordances due to their massive number

    of participants unstructured and

    structured groups with concurrent

    asynchronous and synchronous nature of

    interactions ongoing persistence of

    online life in absence of individual

    presence in addition to the nature of

    collaborative tasks and contributions in

    quote so to kind of summarize their

    review of literature and their little

    introduction of the importance of

    collective learning they mentioned that

    not many people are discussing this

    however there are a lot of people who

    are engaging in these spaces if however

    you are interested in reading some of

    these scholars that they mentioned the

    author last names are Boyd G and ito and

    they kind of all have a lot of research

    on learning within large online

    communities or spaces

    I've actually mentioned G in particular

    in several other podcasts because he was

    a professor of mine okay so in the next

    main section the authors are talking

    about some of the findings for this

    particular study so again in 2011 or at

    least at the time of the writing scratch

    had about 1.2 million members and over

    are significantly higher now the authors

    point out a very important thing to

    consider is that these two types of

    learning that they're kind of comparing

    and contrasting collaborative learning

    and collective learning can and do occur

    simultaneously within scratch so it's

    not like you have to pick one or the

    other and be like okay class today we're

    going to only engage in collaborative

    learning or we're only going to engage

    in collective learning so for everything

    that I'm about to say in terms of the

    comparison between these two types of

    learning just keep in the back of the

    mind that both of these can occur and

    honestly probably should occur to

    encourage a range of participation and

    engagement in the classes that you're

    working with so on page 19 the authors

    discuss collaborative learning

    activities so here's a quote quote

    collaborative activities include mostly

    goal-oriented activities typically in

    the classroom these would include small

    group work team projects discussion

    groups and so on

    outside the classroom collaborative

    activities include playing board games

    most platform-style video games with

    members of your family sitting on

    committees or playing in a rock band in

    the scratch online community

    collaborative activities typically

    revolve around the production of

    particular types of scratch projects by

    a small group of individuals that have

    commonly met one another in the online

    environment end quote

    the authors then go on to kind of

    highlight some scholarships that found

    that people who collaboratively work

    together not only completed a task

    together such as an assignment but it

    they also engaged in a way that provided

    social and emotional support okay so

    also on page 19 the authors and then

    discuss some of the collective learning

    activities so here's a quote quote

    collective activities by contrast

    include larger groups of individual with

    participation that is less goal-oriented

    and revolves more around sustained

    enjoyed participation within the

    community over time these types of

    activities although sparse and classroom

    settings are common particularly in

    online affinity groups and in the arts

    in the Performing Arts in particular

    collective activities are common

    including African dance circles or

    Orchestra performances in quote now

    while I totally understand the idea of

    an orchestra kind of being viewed as a

    collective learning activity I would

    argue that a lot of large ensemble

    experiences in particular don't

    necessarily align with some of the

    things that I'm going to talk about in a

    minute when I compare and contrast

    collaborative this versus collective

    learning it's just slightly different in

    particular when the authors are

    discussing collective learning they talk

    about how the roles are fluid and you're

    able to kind of adapt as needed but in a

    large ensemble setting that typically

    doesn't occur so while I get that

    everybody's kind of collectively working

    together better to create something it

    doesn't necessarily align with some of

    the stuff that I'll mention in a minute

    now the authors do mention that

    collective learning not only helps

    develop personal agency with coding but

    it can also develop status as an expert

    among peers or community members which i

    think is very important it's great for

    kids to kind of develop their own

    individuals expertise and have that

    expertise being recognized outside of a

    small group the authors also highlight a

    previous study that found collective

    learning spaces incurred

    a range of participation so not everyone

    is doing the same thing this is an

    important thing to note that everybody

    is contributing in their own kind of

    unique way in addition the authors also

    suggests that some groups form around in

    infinity so a shared interest within the

    collective so for example if people are

    really into anime or anime of the

    American pronunciation then they might

    get together as kind of a collective or

    even like sub collectives within that so

    for example if somebody is really into

    nadu toh as opposed to Dragon Ball Z

    they might get together with people who

    are really into one anime versus another

    now if there's one thing that I can

    recommend in particular it's to check

    out the table that is on page 20 this

    table really kind of summarizes compares

    and contrasts the two different

    approaches for collaborative learning

    and collective learning so I'm gonna

    kind of give my own summary of that in

    case you don't have access to the paper

    itself which I do highly recommend

    reading okay so the first comparison is

    a comparison of size so the author

    suggests a collaborative learning is

    typically 2 to 5 people whereas

    collective learning is more than 5 so it

    could be like a whole class or maybe a

    whole school or literally hundreds of

    thousands of people now the activities

    are also slated slightly different so in

    collaborative learning they suggest that

    the activities are goal-oriented

    now activities within a collective tend

    to come together around a shared

    affinity so typically speaking it's not

    that like let's say if there's a hundred

    thousand people in the space they're not

    all working towards the same goal

    instead within that space there are

    opportunities for groups to form around

    a shared affinity or even for people to

    just participate in a shared affinity

    without necessarily having to define

    themselves as a member of a group so

    what I mean by that is that for example

    with the anime if people are really into

    not hotel they don't have to necessarily

    work together with other people to

    actually contribute Naruto projects

    within scratch ok now comparing time

    between collaborative and collective so

    for a collaborative learning time is

    usually short and it can be synchronous

    or asynchronous and it's typically

    organized by a group leader now in

    collective however the time is typically

    a synchronous forms of engagement over

    longer periods of time so

    months if not years if not decades of

    time and while it is typically

    asynchronous there are some synchronous

    forms of collaboration or learning or

    sharing and the time is typically

    organized by the collective or maybe a

    webmaster or multiple moderators of like

    a discussion forum or something so for

    example if they're going to create like

    a competition around a particular

    project or theme or idea

    they might say okay here's a competition

    and we have a deadline of this date

    okay so leadership within these two

    different types of learning groups in

    collaborative learning the author

    suggests that leadership is typically

    organized by the teacher itself so for

    example assigning roles within the group

    or maybe even forcing rotation of those

    roles within the groups however in

    collective learning here's a quote from

    page 20 quote in online communities

    leadership is emergent decentralized and

    distributed among a large group of

    individuals collective leadership is

    also an inherent to the role that

    designers play in shaping an online

    community but also co-constructed in the

    community

    unquote so if we're interested in

    learning more about that kind of

    approach to leadership I recommend

    checking out James Paul gee he's got a

    lot of readings related to affinity

    spaces and like leadership within those

    spaces I'll include some links to his

    discussions on that in the show notes ok

    so the next category labor so in

    collaborative learning groups the labor

    is usually through prescribed roles like

    a previously mentioned and if any member

    of the team or the group is absent it

    kind of has a large impact on the group

    so everybody needs to kind of engage in

    a strong role within the group otherwise

    the overall goal could be compromised on

    the other hand in collective learning

    groups members typically take on a

    single but often fluid role that kind of

    fits within the larger collective so

    roles can be adapted as needed and

    absenteeism doesn't really have a big

    impact unless its widespread the reason

    why is because if you just have

    significantly more people who can

    contribute to something it's ok if one

    or two people are unable to contribute

    within the given amount of time in

    addition one of the things defining

    factors is very different about

    of learnings that people are able to

    actually lurk or participate on the

    periphery without impacting the

    collectives goal this is another one of

    those reasons why I would say that

    collective learning is very different

    from most large ensemble settings like

    orchestras and bands and whatnot it's

    because you're typically not supposed to

    engage on the periphery in the final

    section in this table that again is on

    page 20 is knowledge so in collaborative

    learning knowledge is distributed among

    present members and does not build on

    the efforts of prior groups or what they

    refer to as institutional learning

    collective learning on the other hand

    the knowledge is typically stored and

    accessible to a large community so

    although it is distributed among

    individuals across time and space the

    members are able to continue within the

    space over extended periods of time so

    new members are able to learn from

    veterans this is a very key distinction

    so it makes it so that like if we were

    to think of collective learning within

    an educational space not only with kids

    to be able to learn from everybody who's

    present or at school at the time but

    potentially people who were in the same

    class multiple years ago okay so in the

    discussions section the authors conclude

    with the discussion on how there needs

    to be more research on such spaces and

    learning that potentially occurs within

    them and here's that quote from page 22

    quote we also need to consider issues

    about ethics that invariably come up in

    the context of collective production

    sharing and commenting and are

    particularly relevant in the context of

    schooling that still favors individual

    recognition what does it mean when

    members contribute to a large project

    Al's is recognized

    what about remixes that take up existing

    projects and modify them a practice very

    common in network communities unquote

    these are some excellent questions that

    consider in particular if you aren't

    interested in collective learning within

    these spaces that you are working with

    you're going to need to figure out what

    forms of participation and engagement

    count and how are you going to allow or

    encourage kids to be on the periphery

    and maybe not contribute to anything in

    a substantial way if so how do you

    assess that also the authors mention a

    couple of scholars who kind of explore

    the online learning in spaces like this

    that might involve what they're

    describing as collective learning in

    learning more about it check out the

    discussion section at the end and read

    some of those authors that are in there

    or you could check out the ethics

    section of chapter three of my

    dissertation which I link directly to in

    the show notes and it kind of talks

    about is this kind of research ethical

    and if so when all right so that was

    kind of the main summary of the study

    itself now I'm gonna kind of talk about

    some of my lingering questions or

    thoughts so the first one is how my

    education courage both collaborative and

    collective learning in a shared space so

    as an example in my classes we had

    several different programming languages

    that kids can pick from if they were

    working in scratch they could then share

    their projects with me and I would often

    share them in two studios and those

    studios were accessible by anyone in

    grades second all the way up through

    eighth grade so an eighth grader could

    share something with in the studio that

    a second grader could look at and vice

    versa in addition in some of the other

    languages that I encourage in the

    classes that I facilitated I use online

    folders to kind of share code or

    creations that kids make in the classes

    that I worked with this allowed kids to

    kind of learn from each other in

    experiment from each other in kind of

    made a closed circuit collective

    learning environment so that instead of

    just encouraging collective learning

    within the classroom itself so that like

    if there were a class of 30 kids all 30

    of them could learn from each other they

    were then able to kind of asynchronously

    learn from other kids in other classes

    by looking at and reading through code

    or remix in code that others had created

    in other classes this was not just

    horizontal so it wasn't like only third

    graders could look at third grader

    projects it was anybody from second

    grade up through eighth grade could look

    at any project from any of those grade

    levels which by the way when I would

    work with middle school kids in

    particular and they were working on a

    project that I was like I don't know if

    that's school appropriate or not

    I just engage with the discussion with

    them like hey this project is likely

    going to be viewed by a 2nd grader do

    you think that this would be appropriate

    for them to look at that content or to

    engage with that content so a little

    quick tip there ok so my next question

    is how might we encourage collective

    learning that builds off of prior

    efforts so in particular one of the

    things that I love thinking through with

    this idea of collective learning and

    just

    like asynchronous forms of learning and

    informal learning and whatnot is people

    are able to learn from others who may

    have been in that space years ago and

    have not participated since so one of

    the things that I tried to do in a

    university class that I designed and

    facilitated was make us so that we all

    kind of created this wiki and the idea

    was that every single semester we were

    gonna keep adding to and building off of

    that wiki a current class could go back

    multiple semesters or years and kind of

    build off of the work from prior classes

    to kind of collectively create this kind

    of wiki now unfortunately I ended up not

    having enough time to teach that class

    for multiple semesters so I only got to

    do it for one semester so maybe it would

    have worked maybe it wouldn't have not

    sure on that note though a follow-up

    question that I have is how might we

    find balance between reinventing that's

    already been done and breaking new

    ground

    so with that wiki idea the idea was to

    kind of create a shared collective

    understanding of the particular subject

    of that class well much of what we were

    already discussing and engaging with was

    content that was already done this in

    particularly this was a history class so

    what I was struggling with was that

    balance between a synthesis of

    understanding from the collective people

    in the class with okay really were just

    kind of rephrasing what has already been

    done like many of these questions I

    don't really have a firm answer to this

    it's just something that I recommend

    thinking through if you're going to

    consider doing this kind of learning

    another question that I have is how

    might such a community encourage or

    account for continued participation so

    building off of the prior discussion

    think about what happens if somebody

    graduates or maybe they complete a

    course how could they continue to

    contribute to this space or how could

    future people within the class reach

    back out to people who previously took

    the class to kind of ask for

    clarification of something that they

    created now I know this is a lot to ask

    from people and I imagine you wouldn't

    have great participation from people who

    have finished a class wanting to go back

    and like continue to add to it but

    having interviewed multiple people on

    this podcast who have suggested now

    bringing back kids who have graduated to

    come back and share what they have

    learned and the thing

    that they have done why computer science

    in particular or coding is very valuable

    to them I think this is one way that we

    can do that another way that we can do

    it so not just bringing them in as like

    a guest lecturer or something but having

    people like that come back into our

    shared collective learning space and

    continue to contribute to it in some way

    one of the last questions that I have is

    who has access to view or contribute to

    such a space or community so this is an

    important one to consider especially if

    you're in an elementary space is who's

    going to be able to contribute to this

    because while on one hand I'm really all

    for like engagement from not only people

    within the school but people outside of

    the school to bring their own expertise

    into something and engage in expert

    level conversations on the other hand

    bringing in outsiders from school can

    create some serious security or digital

    citizenship concerns so just make sure

    when you're considering this you need to

    think about what platforms you can only

    use who can contribute to those

    platforms in what ways you have like

    moderator control over those

    contributions or have to like give

    permission before things are posted and

    things like that

    alright so that's kind of a summary of

    the article itself and then just some of

    my lingering questions or thoughts as

    always you can find resources and

    questions and other relevant materials

    to this particular episode in the show

    notes in your app and I thank you so

    much for listening I really hope that

    you share this with somebody who might

    be interested in learning more about

    collective learning and how it differs

    from collaborative learning and I hope

    you consider trying to use both forms of

    group learning within the classes that

    you facilitate especially if you are

    right now working in an online

    environment which many of us have been

    due to kovin 19 thank you so much for

    listening I hope you stay tuned for next

    week which will be another interview and

    then two weeks from now another

    unpacking scholarship episode hope

    you're all staying safe and are having a

    wonderful day

Article

Kafai, Y. B., & Peppler, K. A. (2011). Beyond small groups: New opportunities for research in computer-supported collective learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (CSCL) Conference Proceedings, I, 17–24.


Abstract

“CSCL research has focused on understanding and designing collaborative learning in diverse settings and configurations with support of computers. Within this research, however, most efforts have concentrated on studying small group configurations and thus examined what we would like to call ‘collaborative’ learning (i.e., the abilities needed to participate and support collaborations of typically two to five people). Much less emphasis has been placed on studying massive communities and participation in large groups prominent in today’s social networking sites and online gaming cultures that would shift the focus to ‘collective’ learning (i.e., the abilities needed to participate and support collaborations in massive groups). In this paper, we identify key dimensions of collective learning, present observations of online and local participation in one open-source Web 2.0 community with over 630,000 members, called Scratch (scratch.mit.edu), and outline a research agenda for computer-supported collective learning.”


My One Sentence Summary

This analysis of participation within the Scratch community compares and contrasts collaborative learning (i.e., learning within small groups) with collective learning (i.e., learning within massive groups).


Some Of My Lingering Questions/Thoughts

  • How might educators encourage both collaborative and collective learning in a shared space?

  • How might we encourage collective learning that builds off of prior efforts?

    • How might we find balance between reinventing what's already been done and breaking new ground?

    • How might such a community encourage or account for continued participation?

  • Who has access to view or contribute to such a space or community?


Resources/Links Relevant to This Episode



More Content